Mississippi River Bird Migration, Salaire D'un Infirmier D'etat En Cote D'ivoire 2020, Articles P

In 2004, the Department of Health (DOH) introduced the Philippines Contraceptive Self-Reliance Strategy, arranging for the replacement of these donations with domestically provided contraceptives.[6]. Duties and Responsibilities. The individuals can then make use of the cash they receive to purchase birth control devices they may choose, thus guaranteeing freedom of choice. Study now. Thus, for these women, abortion has become a family planning method, in the absence of information on and access to any reliable means to prevent an unplanned and unwanted pregnancy". 12 issued by President Rodrigo Duterte supporting the full implementation of the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health (RPRH) Law is a major push for the government's family planning program, which has been hindered by various challenges to the implementation of the landmark law. It is therefore both ironic and tragic that the Philippines' trajectory is towards the other direction. The country is not a, The penal provisions constitute a violation of free choice and conscience, and establishes, Access to information on natural and modern family planning, Improvement of maternal, infant, and child health and nutrition, Prevention of abortion and management of post-abortion complications, Improvement of adolescent and youth health, Prevention and management of reproductive tract infections, HIV/AIDS and other STDs, Counseling on sexuality and sexual and reproductive health, Treatment of breast and reproductive tract cancers, Male involvement and participation in reproductive health issues, Reproductive health education for the youth, This page was last edited on 5 February 2023, at 13:42. Implementing Rules and Regulations 7 laWRenCe b. fineR & Rubina hussain, unintended PRegnanCy and nsafe aboRtion in the PhiliPPines: Context and ConsequenCes, in bRief (Guttmacher Inst. This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its publication in at least two (2) newspapers of general circulation. PhilHealth Benefits for Serious and Life-Threatening Reproductive Health Conditions. Section 16. The Rizal Law, officially designated as Republic Act No. ", Filipino Freethinkers, an association of agnostics, atheists, progressives, etc., very active in the fight in favor of the RH bill, stepped up the pressure, creating more controversy that fired up renewed interest in the bill on both sides. Prohibited Acts Midwives for Skilled Attendance Reporting Requirements These bills have been seen either as a nullification of the RH Bill, its alternative, or as a way of achieving unity among the populace, since the RH Bill proponents have stated their concern in preventing abortion. [citation needed], European Union Ambassador to the Philippines Alistair MacDonald said "We have all seen the figures on illegal abortion a year in the Philippines and I very much hope that both Houses of Congress will take these issues into account in producing a reproductive health legislation which will really help people make their own choices and to provide for their families. Section 12. Congressional Committee [73], In December 2010, the Cabinet and the CBCP agreed to have a joint campaign providing full information on the advantages and risks of contraceptives, natural and artificial family planning and responsible parenthood. After 13 years of arduous advocacy and steadfast crusade of RH champions, the controversial Reproductive Health bill was enacted as Republic . [71], Lagman on the other hand said that both these priorities are important but with a burgeoning population the budget will become even tighter, thus population growth is a major issue. [28], The Wall Street Journal in July 2012 said that Aquino's "promotion of a 'reproductive health' bill is jarring" since it could lead to "a demographic trap of too few workers. 10354, otherwise known as the "Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012". SEC. (o) Poor refers to members of households identified as poor through the NHTS-PR by the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) or any subsequent system used by the national government in identifying the poor. The editorial of the Philippine Daily Inquirer, moreover, stated that Catholic teaching is "only" a religious teaching and should not be imposed with intolerance on a secular state. The committee quickly passed the bill in just one session. This Act shall be liberally construed to ensure the provision, delivery and access to reproductive health care services, and to promote, protect and fulfill womens reproductive health and rights. [69], Filipinos for Life, an anti-abortion organization, claimed that the bill was funded by foreign population control groups, a claim that Rep. Edcel Lagman denied as "an old yarn which is destitute of factual basis", saying that the lobby opposing the bill was the one which was backed by the "wealthy Catholic hierarchy with the aid of dozens of lay organizations". Section 24. For example, the 1992 study of Ross Levine and David Renelt, which covered 119 countries over 30 years (versus a University of the Philippines study of 3 countries over a few years). The anti-RH advocates accuse the RH supporters of hiding from the public the international population control agenda which includes abortion and they refer to U.S. Secretary Hillary Clinton who said that RH includes abortion. [19][20], The Philippines is the 39th most densely populated country, with a density over 335 per square kilometer,[21] and the population growth rate is 1.9% (2010 Census),[22] 1.957% (2010 est. (a) The right of spouses to found a family in accordance with their religious convictions and the demands of responsible parenthood; (b) The right of children to assistance, including proper care and nutrition, and special protection from all forms of neglect, abuse, cruelty, exploitation, and other conditions prejudicial to their development; 27. 10. Effectivity. Ang Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Law of 2012 (Republic Act No. The Philippines doesn't have too many people, it has too few pro-growth policies". Free choice regarding reproductive health enables people, especially the poor, to have the number of children they want and can feasibly care and provide for. No person shall be denied information and access to family planning services, whether natural or artificial: Provided, That minors will not be allowed access to modern methods of family planning without written consent from their parents or guardian/s except when the minor is already a parent or has had a miscarriage. On February 16, 2011, the bill was endorsed by the House Appropriations Committee with amendment and referred back to the Population Committee for finalizing the language. Prohibited Acts. Section 7. Section 15. Public Awareness. Hiring of Skilled Health Professionals for Maternal Health Care and Skilled Birth Attendance. What is the positive and negative impact of the law in the family and in the What are the disadvantages of RH bill? Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act (RA 10354) For married couples Family planning is a preparation for responsible parenthood. 10354, is a Philippine law that provided universal access to methods on contraception, fertility control, sexual education, and maternal care in the Philippines. health status, socio - cultural and economic concern. Guiding Principles What are the components of the RH Bill? It also mentioned the Catholic Church as opposing . They also proposed "parallel programs for providing information and training, one for Natural Family Planning (NFP) and another for artificial methods of family planning". The State also recognizes and guarantees the promotion and equal protection of the welfare and rights of children, the youth, and the unborn. Unbridled population growth stunts socioeconomic development and aggravates poverty". March 06, 2019. They emphasized that the bill "promotes quality of life, by enabling couples, especially the poor, to bring into the world only the number of children they believe they can care for and nurture to become healthy and productive members of our society". It is an Act that was passed in parliament of Philippines.It states that. It recommends the U.S. leadership to "influence national leaders" and that "improved world-wide support for population-related efforts should be sought through increased emphasis on mass media and other population education and motivation programs by the UN, USIA, and USAID. [79], At 3 in the morning on December 13, 2012, the House of Representatives voted on second reading in favor of the bill with 113109 while five representatives abstained. SEC. Oral arguments were set for June 18 but postponed until July 9 after the Supreme Court received additional petitions and interventions. (m) Natural family planning refers to a variety of methods used to plan or prevent pregnancy based on identifying the womans fertile days. [9], The bill calls for a "multi-dimensional approach" integrates a component of family planning and responsible parenthood into all government anti-poverty programs. The members from the Senate and the House of Representatives shall be appointed by the Senate President and the Speaker, respectively, with at least one (1) member representing the Minority. Separability Clause. [33], Senator Majority Floor Leader Tito Sotto said that the RH Bill is redundant to a 2009 law referred to as the Magna Carta for Women, which contains reproductive health provisions, asking the Senate to drop the bill. Family planning is planning for the family in all aspects of life financially, emotionally, physically, and many more. 3 2013). I. 20. 10354), informally known as the Reproductive Health Law or RH Law, is a law in the Philippines, which guarantees universal access to methods on contraception, fertility control, sexual education, and maternal care. Among other points, they proposed a study on the meaning of conception in the Constitution, and if it means fertilization, abortifacients "are to be banned even now and regardless of whether the RH Bill is passed". 4. [68] They argue that a decreased population growth will lead to improved quality of life and economic development. While there is general agreement about its provisions on maternal and child health, there is great debate on its mandate that the Philippine government and the private sector will fund and undertake widespread distribution of family planning devices such as condoms, birth control pills, and IUDs, as the government continues to disseminate information on their use through all health care centers. All accredited public health facilities shall provide a full range of modern family planning methods, which shall also include medical consultations, supplies and necessary and reasonable procedures for poor and marginalized couples having infertility issues who desire to have children: Provided, That family planning services shall likewise be extended by private health facilities to paying patients with the option to grant free care and services to indigents, except in the case of non-maternity specialty hospitals and hospitals owned and operated by a religious group, but they have the option to provide such full range of modern family planning methods: Provided, further, That these hospitals shall immediately refer the person seeking such care and services to another health facility which is conveniently accessible: Provided, finally, That the person is not in an emergency condition or serious case as defined in Republic Act No. Meanwhile, the Imam Council of the Philippines, the top leaders of the Moslem population which at 4.5million constitutes 5% of the Philippine population, declared that they are against contraceptives since using them "underestimates God" and "makes one lose morality in the process.". According to these economists, which include Solita Monsod, Gerardo Sicat, Cayetano Paderanga, Ernesto M. Pernia, and Stella Alabastro-Quimbo, "rapid population growth and high fertility rates, especially among the poor, do exacerbate poverty and make it harder for the government to address it", while at the same time clarifying that it would be "extreme" to view "population growth as the principal cause of poverty that would justify the government resorting to draconian and coercive measures to deal with the problem (e.g., denial of basic services and subsidies to families with more than two children)".